Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:46:54 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@FreeBSD.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc Message-ID: <521CBBDE.6030503@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308260329190.3920@trevally.site> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <CAE-m3X324rbdP_C=az4eO-EkMcR-yFAeRG7S4q%2BMUsnMezGddw@mail.gmail.com> <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308260329190.3920@trevally.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/25/13 18:41, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be >> compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports >> that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of >> ports that can't be compiled with clang but fill fine on lang/gcc. >> >> I'll gonna recheck whether lang/gcc42 is sufficient for them. But I >> have that bad feeling... > If there are ports that use USE_GCC=any and do not build with > lang/gcc, these should have USE_GCC=4.2 -- without a '+'! -- > not USE_GCC=any. > > It'll be great if you can fix any such port. It would be particularly nice if we had a port with FreeBSD's many patches to 4.2. lang/gcc42 (and 46 and lang/gcc) do not build on powerpc64, for example, while our in-tree GCC does. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521CBBDE.6030503>