Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:07:14 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: pkg 1.4 freeze please test test test!
Message-ID:  <20141029140714.GB9726@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141029130348.GK9763@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <20141028231933.GG26796@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20141029121326.GA83878@zxy.spb.ru> <20141029122452.GH82736@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20141029123157.GI9763@zxy.spb.ru> <20141029124025.GI82736@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20141029124832.GJ9763@zxy.spb.ru> <20141029125304.GJ82736@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20141029130348.GK9763@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:03:49PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:53:04PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>=20
> > > > How can we know pecl-memcache has to be reinstalled?
> > > >=20
> > > > We won't reinstall each time a version of a dep changes :)
> > >=20
> > > And what is solution?
> > > May be some flag on package (php) for reinstall all deps?
> >=20
> > I do have no idea, I'm open for suggestions :)
> > Either on the package side with triggers but that means implementing tr=
igger in
> > package
> > Or in package side with provide/requires saying that this packages requ=
ires an
> > exact version of php meaning in case of upgrade of php the version woul=
d have
> > changed
>=20
> May be (as workaround) some database witch this packages?
> List, or regexp.
>=20
> This is need for some binary modules and don't need for "text"
> modules.
> But for some cases -- and for "text" modules too.
>=20
> > Or someone has to be clever and find a ports only solution.
>=20
> On ports side pecl-memcache rebuild on php version changed.
>=20
> > Why the help does a minor version has an inpact on the pecl? isn't the =
abi
> > stable over minor versions?
>=20
> I am don't know -- I am not php guru.
> As result -- memcache module don't loaded and "class Memcache not
> found".
> May be just strict version check.
>=20

=46rom what I do read from here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess#releases_cycle

only going from X.Y to X.Y+1 needs to rebuild the extensions.
and going from X.Y.Z to X.Y.Z+1 should be compatible

regards,
Bapt

--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlRQ9JIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzKAgCgtjowFND9IMV5vdSe5ZqFkbRr
edgAn1okxEy8ePH4HdP17bWCSZy0ocj0
=Ywa8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141029140714.GB9726>