Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:09:09 +0300
From:      Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
To:        Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@rktmb.org>
Cc:        freebsd Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
Message-ID:  <4E5DB3E5.6070400@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org>
References:  <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
30.08.2011 12:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison
>> with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD
>> over other systems.
>
> I dont think a monthly update is the good solution.
> A per release update is better, as far as releases bring a new set that
> could be compared.

I don't think all other OS'es will bring new set of features only when 
FreeBSD is released.

> Then, a deep knwoledge of the other OSes is required in order to keep
> credit. I think it's a huge amount of work, that should be assigned to
> the project itself.
>
> IMHO, Let's delegate this task to Wikipedia or StackOverflow...

I totally disagree. Sites like Wikipedia or StackOverflow serve they own 
means. When it comes to the point of selecting os you need to show exec 
one page or even give him one document and searching different bits of 
information on different sites wouldn't be pretty. Besides it's much 
better to have control over this page to make sure it's fresh and current.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5DB3E5.6070400>