Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:19:41 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au> Cc: bsd <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ISP <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: annex+sco, no worries, fbsd, yes Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205091539.822E-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199702042151.HAA06076@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Robert Chalmers wrote: > Here's an interesting one. > > If I run SCO 3.2v4.2 + the Annex(V9.2), traffic flows now worries in both > directions. No problems with rfc1323 or anything else. > > Hook up the FreeBSD 2.2 + Annex(V9.2). Immediate problems. Anything that speaks > rfc 1323 has problems. (mostly Sun's and other FreeBSD machines it seems) > > Why is this? Is there a technical reason for this that anyone knows about? I thought we went through this. RFC 1323 extension data streams have SYN packets with data in them, at the connection setup. Annex OS v 9.x throws a fit when it sees a TCP packet with SYN set and actual data. Traditional TCP connections are setup using SYN/SYN-ACK packets with no data payload. Does SCO support RFC 1323 TCP extensions? Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970205091539.822E-100000>