Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jun 1997 23:59:54 -0400
From:      Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com
Cc:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Borland 16bit bcc vs cc/gcc (float)
Message-ID:  <199706030359.XAA06162@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1606.865213662@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>> I thought that 2ed was NT?
> What?  I thought we were talking about C.

I thought that the 2nd edition of Kernighan and Ritchie's book, "The C
Programming Language", discussed ANSI C (or at least it says "ANSI C"
in big red letters on the cover), which is also known as New
Testament C.  In many Christian religious discussions, New Testament
is frequently abbreviated NT.

Happy hacking,
joelh

-- 
http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu
All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's.

Second law of programming:
Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706030359.XAA06162>