Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 20:10:10 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac) Cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ELM 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] - folder is corrupt! Message-ID: <199608281610.UAA01538@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199608280734.AA011157693@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> from "Hr.Ladavac" at "Aug 28, 96 09:34:53 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, and it means that sendmail and elm do not agree about the mailbox > locking protocol. Sendmail and Elm both use flock(). Procmail use fcntl(), but I just change it to flock() too. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608281610.UAA01538>