Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:48:52 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: ipfw behaviour with non IPv4 packets Message-ID: <20020729224852.A49134@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20020730054340.GB89241@blossom.cjclark.org>; from crist.clark@attbi.com on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:43:40PM -0700 References: <20020725001652.A94913@iguana.icir.org> <20020730054340.GB89241@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
when you pass inconsistent options the rule will never match -- now a more sophisticated user interface might detect that and prevent such a rule from being entered, but this is not a major issue. cheers luigi On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:43:40PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: ... > What happens when you do, > > pass ip from any to any ipoptions blah,blah... > > Or some other field that is inconsistent for both IPv4 and IPv6? > > Or more simply can you do, > > pass ip from 192.168.0.1 to any > > And, > > pass ip from fe80::203:0405:0607:0809 to any > > And, > > pass ip from 192.168.0.1 or fe80::203:0405:0607:0809 to any > > And ipfw(8) will "do the right thing?" (Whatever that might be?) > -- > Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu > | cjclark@jhu.edu > http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020729224852.A49134>