Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 06:37:49 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, net@FreeBSD.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd)) Message-ID: <45633.1211870269@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 May 2008 08:27:36 %2B0200." <20080527062736.GF64397@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20080527062736.GF64397@hoeg.nl>, Ed Schouten writes: >> >The new TTY layer should still support line disciplines, [...] >> >> Actually... I think it shouldn't. > >With the word `should' I meant that it would still be possible to >implement multiple line disciplines with the mpsafetty code. But I >really think line disciplines should go. No, don't bother. Remove the entire "abstraction" of linedisciplines. >What should happen with the NETGRAPHDISC? It should be done in userland if it is necessary at all. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45633.1211870269>