Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:07:29 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/flowscan Makefile Message-ID: <3AB75611.24C01FCA@FreeBSD.org> References: <200103201044.f2KAiEI19274@freefall.freebsd.org> <3AB73793.BF47F626@FreeBSD.org> <20010320124527.A25787@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:57:23PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > > > andreas 2001/03/20 02:44:14 PST > > > > > > Modified files: > > > net/flowscan Makefile > > > Log: > > > - correct distfiles variable > > > - use LOCALBASE in BUILD dependency, so cflowd will be found > > > this should cure bentos build problems by multiply trying to > > > build/install cflowd (problem didn't show up here) > > > > Didn't I fixed it a hour ago? :-P > > > > > - bumped port revision > > > > This isn't really necessary when you fix port from the unbuildable state. > > I didn't know that you are still working on the port. Not actually. I'm just browsing throuth bento logs trying to fix as much small errors as possible. > Got the message indicating, that I didn't have up to date version. > Did cvs update and committ, since my version was worked out properly > now and wanted to resolve bentos build problems with that. > Since I already compiled the flowscan port locally, I wasn't sure, > if other people need a flag (portrevision) that there is a more > revised version out ... Well next time please try to think it out, because bumping PORTREVISION without a reason is almost as bad as not bumping when there is a reason for it. > Anyway ... not a big deal, thanks for your time Thank you! ;) -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AB75611.24C01FCA>