Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:43:17 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d Message-ID: <86tz69a4yy.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <670f29e20903032109r7f577b82k59fcec55b0452385@mail.gmail.com> (Ivan Grover's message of "Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:39:17 %2B0530") References: <670f29e20902240717m49f53bfx67166c151c01384b@mail.gmail.com> <86eixnfwr2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <670f29e20902270618m23eed4acg15a8a3e7b43fe327@mail.gmail.com> <670f29e20902270810h22adc102rd9500d74208b1f11@mail.gmail.com> <86fxhxh2mq.fsf@ds4.des.no> <670f29e20903032109r7f577b82k59fcec55b0452385@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks for your valuable inputs. The PAM module information is not yet cl= ear > for me. The pam_unix, which i debugged was from Linux-PAM-0.78 (www.*linu= x* > fromscratch.org/blfs/view/blfs-book-6.0-html/postlfs/*linux*_*pam*.html ) Why? This is not what FreeBSD uses. > I think the libraries too belong to the same library. I apologize=EF=BF= =BD if i > asked this query to wrong forum. FreeBSD hasn't used Linux-PAM since 2002 or so. > Currently i dont see any issues with crypt library as you have suggested.= I > will plan to upgrade the PAM library and see how it goes. Upgrade what from what to what? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tz69a4yy.fsf>