Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 21:36:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Otter <otterr@telocity.com>, -questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, -current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Kernel making problems Message-ID: <200005280336.VAA49359@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 May 2000 20:29:14 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005272028160.26845-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005272028160.26845-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005272028160.26845-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net> Jaye Mathisen writes: : Wasn't there just a big to-do wrt to 4.0 (then -current), about the right : way to do things is to install a new kernel, then build the world? Yes. That was needed for a while since the new binaries produced code the olkd kernel couldn't execute. : I seem to remember Rod championing this method. (Had something to do with : some syscall interface changing). Yup. However, with the changes to binutils and also the kernel .s files, we have no choice. You'll need at least the binutils. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005280336.VAA49359>