Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:30:39 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mark@linus.demon.co.uk, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, nate@sri.MT.net
Subject:   Re: Building inside of /usr/src?
Message-ID:  <199606270930.TAA03774@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>places and trivial to change.  I simply didn't want to add yet another
>variable to the mix when an old one could be chaned, but if people
>really do want a new OBJBASEDIR variable or something (suggestions
>accepted :-) then at this point I'm more than happy to give it to

I already suggested MAKEOBJTREE :-).

>them.  I still think that this variable, whatever it is, should be set
>in sys.mk since we already set things like the X11BASE there.

Those things shouldn't be set there.  Setting X11BASE there was expedient:

----------------------------
revision 1.5
date: 1994/09/04 02:52:27;  author: jkh;  state: Exp;  lines: +5 -1
Add an X11BASE variable that currently points to /usr/X386 but will
be easy to change to /usr/X11R6 if and when the time comes.  This is
to deal with things like xditview which otherwise had hardcoded assumptions
about where X lived.  Yuck.
Submitted by:	jkh
----------------------------

but jhk recently removed xditview to complete the removal of X from the
source tree, so there is no need for X11BASE in the source tree now.  It
is only referenced in make.conf (defined there), porting.sgml
(documented for bsd.ports.mk there), sys.mk (usual default defined
there) and bsd.port.mk (defined there).

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606270930.TAA03774>