Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:12:29 +0100 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports containing perl modules go into /lib instead of /usr/local/lib Message-ID: <20031111131229.GA91623@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <16303.58941.382301.400967@yertle.int.kciLink.com> References: <16294.34255.356451.725973@yertle.int.kciLink.com> <20031110003359.GB43349@toxic.magnesium.net> <3FAEE4E3.7000702@fillmore-labs.com> <20031110011854.GD43349@toxic.magnesium.net> <20031110013624.GE43349@toxic.magnesium.net> <16303.46232.713078.496625@yertle.int.kciLink.com> <3FAFC336.3030806@fillmore-labs.com> <16303.51123.347649.592276@yertle.int.kciLink.com> <3FAFDA5E.2030308@fillmore-labs.com> <16303.58941.382301.400967@yertle.int.kciLink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:25:49PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: > But none of this has much to do with my original problem of other > ports installing their perl parts into /lib rather than > /usr/local/lib. What is the output of /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -le 'print $ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION' on the machine in question? \Anton. -- If I did know the future of Perl, and if I told you, you'd probably run away screaming. -- Larry Wall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031111131229.GA91623>