Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:50:46 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Subject: Re: 1:1 threading. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303291250360.80824-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3E852ABD.E77EA566@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'm happy to see the limit of (NKSEs !> NCPU) lifted for processes that > > are in some way identified as 1:1 mode processes.. > > I don't want to lift it for KSE mode processes however. > > > > For system scope threads, I guess you just allocate a separate KSEGRP > > so it has somewhere to store pertinent info. > > > > that makes it rather simple > > system scope threads have a thread, a KSE and a KSEGRP > > process scope threads just use the existing KSEGRP. > > > > Everythiong should just "fall out correctly" by doing this.. > > Except that means for process scope threads, you don't get SMP > scalability, since the single KSEGRP binds them all to a single > CPU... right? no > > -- Terry >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0303291250360.80824-100000>