Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:44:17 -0400 From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Alan Eldridge <alane@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proper categories (was Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/xmms-pipe Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist) Message-ID: <20020826174417.GB58144@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020826165854.55770.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <200208261018.g7QAIBuJ000657@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020826165854.55770.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 01:58:32PM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: >On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:17:49AM -0700, Alan Eldridge wrote: >> alane 2002/08/26 03:18:11 PDT >> >> Modified files: >> misc Makefile >> Removed files: >> misc/xmms-pipe Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr >> pkg-plist >> Log: >> Moved port to audio/ where all the other xmms-* ports live. > > Well, I think that the maintainer did not oppose this. >However, I seriously oppose this. :) > audio is for audio related ports. I read audio related >as for audio processing be it coding/decoding/playing... xmms-pipe >does no such thing. It is a plugin for xmms that allows users to >control xmms through a named pipe. The best argument I can make is that xmms-pipe and p5-Xmms do the same thing via different interface (fifo vs socket). p5-Xmms is already in audio, and I *do* think they belong together. -- AlanE KDE-FreeBSD Team (http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020826174417.GB58144>