Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:39:52 +0800 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Antony Mawer" <fbsd-current@mawer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <dimma@higis.ru> Subject: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http) Message-ID: <d763ac660804232139h5b79783dhc963c0fd04226768@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <480FB389.2030102@mawer.org> References: <8481.1208889581@critter.freebsd.dk> <480E3E66.3000303@samsco.org> <fuli49$pa3$1@ger.gmane.org> <480E589C.8010108@delphij.net> <480EE8B2.2020907@higis.ru> <20080423154626.F64388@fledge.watson.org> <480FB389.2030102@mawer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/04/2008, Antony Mawer <fbsd-current@mawer.org> wrote: > > Does this mean that on a multi-core system, one is better avoiding accept > filters and accepting a small latency hit in return for better SMP > scalability/reduced lock contention? Try benchmarking it? Somehow I don't think the HTTP accept filter does what people think it does. adrian -- Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660804232139h5b79783dhc963c0fd04226768>