Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:52:22 +0200 From: Marko Zec <zec@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: vimage and curvnet. Message-ID: <200809192252.22640.zec@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <48D3FF54.2010802@elischer.org> References: <200809191743.m8JHhZj8009388@repoman.freebsd.org> <200809192023.42904.zec@freebsd.org> <48D3FF54.2010802@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 19 September 2008 21:36:52 Julian Elischer wrote: .... > sure, well, if a running thread has curvnet in the pcpu field > and it is put back in the the thread struct on deschedule. > then what in td_vnet while the thread is running is not really > important. Yes this makes sense, and should be worth experimenting with. It's only that I feel reluctant to start touching anything in our scheduler(s) until all the other big changes settle in a bit first. Marko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809192252.22640.zec>