Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:55:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> To: Dolgan <dolgan2k@home.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome compliance and speed? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006282253390.17913-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <013201bfe172$5e545650$2cad0b18@c169507b>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Dolgan wrote: ... : I installed clean from a 6-27-2000 snapshot. That was yesterday. Wouldn't : that make the ports updated, or not..? Hmm, it should yes. : Why would it be a ports thing, though? It's Gnome 1.2.1... latest. Is there : something weird with ports? : Latest sawfish too. Yeah, but ports often apply several patches to make things work right on FreeBSD, those patches could have been updated without a version upgrade of gnome. Given that you installed from a snapshot of yesterday, you should have the latest ports though. At this point, I'm not sure what the problem is.. Maybe someone who runs the combination would have an idea. * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5WrqRdMMtMcA1U5ARAseTAJ4g927b4R9ACY5SRVX++MBW8cu3NACgr4V0 hvHt/mfYRJppqBesXVYH/RU= =tMyz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006282253390.17913-100000>