Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Sep 2000 01:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.org, sjr@home.net
Subject:   Re: sysctl on boot. 
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000919011801.40151A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <200009172043.OAA25218@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Warner Losh wrote:

> I don't think there are any non-idempotent sysctls that people would
> be setting from rc.sysctl.  However, I think I'm leaning towards
> a second parameter to /etc/rc.sysctl.  The first one would be
> /etc/sysctl.conf and the second would be /etc/sysctl.modules.conf over
> the short term.

There are some idempotent sysctls that might be relevant -- in particular,
ones relating to security that disable features.  For example, you'll find
that if you set kern.suser_permitted to 0, no further sysctl's can be set.
As such, it is not idempotent, and ordering is very important :-).   You
could argue, however, that the setting of that variable belongs in an
ordered rc event.

I'd be tempted to have rc.sysctl run only at the end of /etc/rc
processing, and as other sysctls have ordering requirements, to indicate
that they should be placed strategically in /etc/rc and others such that
they make sense, or set when appropriate modules are loaded.


  Robert N M Watson 

robert@fledge.watson.org              http://www.watson.org/~robert/
PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37  ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1
TIS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000919011801.40151A-100000>