Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:36:15 +0800 From: Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org> To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about periodic Message-ID: <20050222183614.GA1644@tongi.org> In-Reply-To: <20050222095536.E97883@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <1109071079.1390.21.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20050222095536.E97883@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:06:16AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> Or take the -u out of the default, which I think is the intended behavior,
> looking at the commit logs. The daily_status_security_diff_flags option
> predates the pf scripts by about 3 months so I'm not sure how that got
> past testing :)
>
> Please send-pr this and poke mlaier and keramida about it.
At that time the pf scripts was made, it was solely used on
5.3-RELEASE here. :p (*cough cough*, I see, no excuse.) It looks like
pf, ipfw and ipf periodic scripts are all suffering from exactly the
same pain.
# grep -l new_only 5*
500.ipfwdenied
510.ipfdenied
520.pfdenied
--
Clive Tong-I Lin | http://tongi.org | PGP KeyID: A008C03E
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050222183614.GA1644>