Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 17:30:04 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UFS large directory performance Message-ID: <3B18338C.4641B4F4@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010601123814.65702E-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200106011806.f51I6PK85431@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Dillon wrote: > I can see this really helping mail queue performance, > especially when coupled with softupdates, and also > helping samba (windoz likes to scan directories), and > perhaps even squid to a degree. The new code is interesting; it will be enlightening to see it's real world performance. I'd definitely suggest using a zone for the allocations, however. FWIW: I guess if you are having problems with mail queue perofrmance, you are running postfix or qmail or something, instead of sendmail, with the mail queue divisions, or with my and David Wolfskill's per-domain mail queue patches? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B18338C.4641B4F4>