Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:58:30 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: please try bwn(4) in -HEAD Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=pXXsELzTZzcbmS=JnHARBs9ChoQKwHqXkfE77o4zXxQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=vhvA-uetDt4ytDCHgtkgvRnOULuq4asqPg9QaHdKBsA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=vhvA-uetDt4ytDCHgtkgvRnOULuq4asqPg9QaHdKBsA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... and I just fixed more rate control stuff, which now makes it useful enough to watch youtube on. I'm kinda shocked. Please do try the latest bwn driver in -HEAD. -adrian On 3 May 2016 at 18:38, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote: > I can't believe I'm about to say this, but.. > > .. please try bwn(4) on HEAD. If you have a NIC that does 11a, please > let me know as I have more fixes relating to frame protection and rate > selection that need to go in. > > I just fixed a couple of very dumb bugs that prevented the thing from > working except in completely ideal circumstances, which for 2g is > pretty amazingly hard to find these days. > > No, I won't port this to stable/10. Someone else is very welcome to > backport bwn(4) fixes to stable/10 and beyond; you don't need my > blessing. > > > > -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=pXXsELzTZzcbmS=JnHARBs9ChoQKwHqXkfE77o4zXxQ>