Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:58:50 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: first patch for process-shared semaphore Message-ID: <4B32CADA.4010407@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20091223203539.400bbfda@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <4B317741.8080004@freebsd.org> <20091223074707.2a7ca9d6@kan.dnsalias.net> <4B32C25A.8040703@freebsd.org> <20091223203539.400bbfda@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:22:34 +0800 > David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: >> libthr does not require semaphore, it implements semaphore, >> it is easier than other ways to implement the process-shared. >> > Let me rephrase: I do not think semaphores belong in libthr. They > should be either in libc or in librt. > > OK, does others really implement semaphore in librt ? unfortunately, the librt already requires libpthread to implement SIGEV_THREAD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B32CADA.4010407>