Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:36:13 -0600
From:      Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Drew Sanford <lauasanf@bellsouth.net>
Cc:        Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Afterstep port
Message-ID:  <20001114153613.G62344@bonsai.knology.net>
In-Reply-To: <3A11A425.584AA377@bellsouth.net>; from lauasanf@bellsouth.net on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:44:21PM -0600
References:  <20001114114037.A46808@hub.freebsd.org> <3A11A425.584AA377@bellsouth.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:44:21PM -0600, Drew Sanford wrote:
# Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
# > 
# > Hello!
# > 
# > Is there any sense to keep x11-wm/afterstep port?
# > It represents an old 1.0 version, while the latest stable version is 1.8.4
# > (afterstep-stable port).
# > 
# > If there will be no objections, I propose to remove x11-wm/afterstep
# > and to repo-copy afterstep-stable -> afterstep.
# 
# I personally think this is a bad idea, unless you plan to keep an
# afterstep 1.0 port somewhere. Its a simple, lightweight, very functional
# manager. Not being able to simply type 'make install' to add it to a new
# machine would severely increase the amount of typing I have to do to set
# up a new machine:)

I'm with Drew on this one.  I use AfterStep version 1.0 on all my
boxes and will continue to do so because:

	- It is stable.
	- It is small.
	- Has a single file to tweak configuration parameters.
	- Doesn't require hundreds of other ports to be installed
	  before you can build or run it.  The only additional
	  port (on top of X) is xpm and that is only a couple of
	  hundred kB.
	- Doesn't require one to have a quad CPU bohemoth to run
	  like so many of the new window managers.
	- It does everything I need.

I vote we leave it in there.  If it is in need of a MAINTAINER then
I'll do it.  Need someplace to host the distfile, then I can do
that too.  Surely there are plenty of other ports that constitute
really dead wood that you could pick on.

-steve

PS: I haven't tried sawfish yet, but I'm going to RSN.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001114153613.G62344>