Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 01:13:44 +0200 (SAST) From: Peter Lockhart <peter@key.co.za> To: Alex <alex@aspenworks.com> Cc: Robert Hough <rch@qserve.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cucipop port/source Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10005310107440.14656-100000@tigger.key.co.za> In-Reply-To: <39342CFC.7065E720@aspenworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Alex wrote: > Robert, > > It is faster. cucipop does not copy the mail file to a tmp file like > qpopper does. The trade off to consider is that cucipop will not > re-synch after abnormal disconnects as well qpopper does. It appears > that the temp file qpopper uses keeps better track of the individual > mail messages downloaded. I actually switched from cucipop to qpopper for this reason. It was becoming a hassle having clients complain of duplicate mails being recieved. The reasons seeming to be mail clients not issuing disconnects properly (all Outlook) and hence cucipop not removing them. Also, mysql patches are available for qpopper :) Cheers Peter Lockhart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.10005310107440.14656-100000>