Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:16:03 -0600 (CST)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To:        Damjan Marion <damjan.marion@gmail.com>
Cc:        toolchain@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ARM issue with old binutils
Message-ID:  <alpine.LNX.2.00.1106250911230.15592@gerinyyl.fvgr>
In-Reply-To: <0C35FE0F-3301-44C6-AC40-233F6C446EBC@gmail.com>
References:  <0C35FE0F-3301-44C6-AC40-233F6C446EBC@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
> I see 3 options to fix this:
> 
> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics  ("mov r0, r0, rrx" instead of "rrx r0,r0")
> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
> 3. patch binutils to support this new mnemonics

  4. Finally upgrade to a modern version of binutils.

Yes, I know that is GPLv3.  Been there, done that, and it is not a problem 
at all, just FUD.  IBM, SAP, Oracle, and all the others are not concerned
about GPLv3 in the toolchain, nor should we.  Except for FUD.

Gerald




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1106250911230.15592>