Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:53:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204426] Processes terminating cannot access memory Message-ID: <bug-204426-16-MrFBmQgsbc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204426 --- Comment #69 from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Robert Blayzor from comment #68) Ok. Some of the changes in 10.2 fixed problems related to loading libthr.s= o.3 at runtime after the binary had started (which is why I asked my question).= I think that my suggestion of using LD_PRELOAD would not be a useful test giv= en your reply. It might still be useful to try putting a 10.1 libthr in your = 10.2 image to see if just swapping out libthr fixes the issue. If it does it at least helps narrow down where the problem lies. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204426-16-MrFBmQgsbc>