Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 05:26:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Entities for some instances (was: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml) Message-ID: <20020822122631.26235.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020822121908.A93812@sumuk.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:59:29PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > The &ms.*; entities could also include stuff like: > > > > &ms.dos.6; > > &ms.office.97; > > > > But I'm very skeptical about introducing entities for stuff like this. > > The main intention would be to make it easier to type consistently > > something that looks prettier than "foo bar" and is not as hard > > to remember. Does this sound crazy to anyone? On the side note, The entity, &ms.win.95 (or any other windows entity) should expand to: "<trademark class="registered">Microsoft Windows 95</trademark>" The mark is very important. We also need to add an entity for "UNIX", which expands to: "<trademark>UNIX</trademark>" This is just my opinion of how it should be done. -- Hiten __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020822122631.26235.qmail>