Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:40:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: ports/13370: elm-port upgraded, improved Message-ID: <199908260240.TAA52865@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/13370; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ache@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: ports/13370: elm-port upgraded, improved Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:40:36 -0400 (EDT) On 25-Aug-99 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > >>Number: 13370 >>Category: ports >>Synopsis: elm-port upgraded, improved >>Confidential: no >>Severity: serious >>Priority: medium >>Responsible: freebsd-ports >>State: open >>Quarter: >>Keywords: >>Date-Required: >>Class: change-request >>Submitter-Id: current-users >>Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 24 23:30:00 PDT 1999 >>Closed-Date: >>Last-Modified: >>Originator: Mikhail Teterin >>Release: FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386 >>Organization: > Virtual Estates, Inc. >>Environment: > >>Description: > > The current version of the port is very old -- it is ...54. Version > ..60 was released at the end of May. The current version would not > build on my 2.2.8 system, which does not have inttypes.h. I received word that elm 2.5 was out some time ago. However, my attempts at upgrading the mail/elm port (from 2.4ME+54 to 2.5.1) were not 100% successful. If you would like to have a look at the work I've done, let me know. Or, you can leave this upgrade to be committed and (try to make a 2.4ME+64->2.5 upgrade or ignore elm 2.5 altogether). -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908260240.TAA52865>