Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:55:50 +0200
From:      Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: flash
Message-ID:  <ef60af09041024235579a31baa@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ef60af0904102423537cfb8ab4@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ef60af0904102221565dbbd530@mail.gmail.com> <417A69B2.1070007@sydnet.net> <ef60af09041023111634bd0187@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af090410231220a688c5a@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0904102423021787c31b@mail.gmail.com> <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af0904102423184c444813@mail.gmail.com> <26FD3DFA-264E-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af0904102423537cfb8ab4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash
actualy it doesnt do anything :)

(damit pressed reply again instead of reply all)


On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:53:11 +0200, Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> wrote:
> well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash
> actualy it doesnt do anything :)
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:21:48 -0400, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:18 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> >
> > > And which one do you recommend ?
> > >
> > linux-flashplugin6, but try both and see which works better for you.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:06:37 -0400, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Can somebody tell me the difference between
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-firefox
> > >>
> > >> Uses graphics/libflash (which is a GPL)
> > >>
> > >>> and
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper
> > >>
> > >> Uses www/linux-flashplugin6 from macromedia
> > >>
> > >> Michael
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef60af09041024235579a31baa>