Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 May 2007 21:06:55 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Scott Swanson <scotts@inetz.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: spin lock held too long (w/ backtrace)
Message-ID:  <20070511010654.GA75689@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <4643C010.7060302@inetz.com>
References:  <46438569.1000506@inetz.com> <20070510214348.GA68925@xor.obsecurity.org> <4643C010.7060302@inetz.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:

> >> Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
> >> spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for > 5 seconds
> > 
> > What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
> > 
> > Kris
> > 
> 
> Is this the best way to determine the action of the thread?
> 
> Regards;
> Scott
> 
> (kgdb) info threads
>   90 Thread 100123 (PID=18303: bsdtar)  0xc0644f5b in sched_switch
> (td=0xc95a5900, newtd=0xc92aad80, flags=0) at
> /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c:973

Yes, now 'proc 18303' and 'bt'.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070511010654.GA75689>