Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:04:29 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AP performance (again): txpower regulation Message-ID: <1903660247.20110909160429@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokAvtKTUGo5zBS3ry0nRH=P%2B1TNB2n-9dKK%2BSWn6FdJ2A@mail.gmail.com> References: <663133681.20110907193747@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmonai4LzwanLw7i5d-NyjN2b6GqfttjkdcROvOuEcuzEAw@mail.gmail.com> <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmo=R-a%2BqhDLWj1n%2BBj70Pmg4WSL6bVZ6jwCUmNq=v7EBBw@mail.gmail.com> <426917282.20110908125907@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAAUsrB5Qtokpcz-koUfYWCHrsnUUErQSAYHrXrW2F0Uvp3RzSA@mail.gmail.com> <4610390305.20110908154130@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAAUsrB6LJ%2BmuTvaqHCySh6e9dMjzshohYFE4PQ3KTezZMZS2JA@mail.gmail.com> <1705262661.20110908180850@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAAUsrB7CFu096x%2BKKWa=8O_VeSHOK10LuwJ2rWq6r8EidUrL=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokvXfUAZpxDgv5gLrRdLYn3YwTXAOb7QiTyUg8K5yKLHg@mail.gmail.com> <458771414.20110908183656@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmom_ZHKbqt%2BQgmdq_oPU-SugbrJ3LNS=g-cpcQ7KExusUw@mail.gmail.com> <4910491962.20110908185213@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmo==J_9ZhnSciVKNaEaMhM4oeM9fr4yjzPev_MW3g9DALg@mail.gmail.com> <1273865639.20110908191303@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1607911768.20110909113824@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vm onfU0iJUiC%2BhT32XvH3t9qwKy98o9GdxMZxqebcSPL04Q@mail.gmail.com> <1853154884.20110909145338@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAJ-VmokAvtKTUGo5zBS3ry0nRH=P%2B1TNB2n-9dKK%2BSWn6FdJ2A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 9 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 15:06:03: > Right, but this is where you now do some more digging. :) Ok, I have friend of mine with his not-so-old notebook here. It could do 802.11a, channels 36-64 and 149-165. It works worse than 802.11g. Signal strength is lower when two notebooks are side-by-side and bandwidth is almost the same or lower. This firend's notebook shows exactly the same performance for 802.11g as mine, so, I think, they have comparable cards and antennas inside. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1903660247.20110909160429>