Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:43:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Vaclav Haisman <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: journaling fs and large mailbox format Message-ID: <20050930213905.M74024@logout.sh.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <433C9E44.8000800@FreeBSD.org> References: <433B3F41.8060004@spintech.ro> <433B60EE.4090207@centtech.com> <433C9A64.3030602@spintech.ro> <433C9E44.8000800@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Doug Barton wrote: > Alin-Adrian Anton wrote: > >> XFS fits incredibly well with Maildir, however this I did not test >> practically > > I am curious as to what the defaults are for frag, inode, and block sizes on > XFS, and whether that is one of the factors that make it work well with > maildir. > > Doug I don't think that frag, inode and block size is the main factor that makes XFS work well in many small files situations. From what I have read about XFS I gather that it allocates inodes on demand, that it doesn't have fixed amount of them. VH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050930213905.M74024>