Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:31:26 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: P-i <p-i@email.it> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: dsniff-2.3 Message-ID: <20050107163126.GA827@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <1ffb43d522f2428721cb3725161a6f19@213.156.52.112> References: <1ffb43d522f2428721cb3725161a6f19@213.156.52.112>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:23:06AM +0100, P-i wrote:
> Insert
>=20
> + #define BIOCIMMEDIATE _IOW('B',112, u_int)
>=20
> in pcaputils.c in /usr/ports/security/dsniff/work....
Mmm... why? pcaputil.s includes <net/pcap.h>, and /usr/include/net/pcap.h
includes <net/bpf.h>. The /usr/include/net/bpf.h contains the definition
for BIOCIMMEDIATE - I assume that's where you got it from in the first
place.
Are you saying that on your version of FreeBSD and/or your state of the
Ports Collection some of the above is not true? That is, are you saying
that dsniff's pcaputil.c does not include <net/pcap.h>, or that
<net/pcap.h> does not include <net/bpf.h>, or that /usr/include/net/pcap.h
does not include <net/bpf.h>, or that /usr/include/net/bpf.h does not
define BIOCIMMEDIATE?
G'luck,
Peter
--=20
Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish.
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB3rle7Ri2jRYZRVMRAtqxAKCTSgYbEN5NRxYjp8oAeFqWl73ncQCdH9rH
CPf/CQlwH4Knl7zPZ6D0C1M=
=2S9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050107163126.GA827>