Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:22:38 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: finrod@ewox.org (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: s/bpfilter/bpf/ Message-ID: <199810291922.LAA27011@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <86u30n7bk9.fsf@niobe.ewox.org> from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= at "Oct 29, 98 02:16:38 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav writes: > While in Arnhem, I discussed renaming the bpfilter pseudo-device to > bpf. There seemed to be agreement that it would be more consistent > (amongst other items, the device nodes are named /dev/bpf*, and the > man page is bpf(4)). While you're at it, could you also fix the /dev/MAKEDEV script so if you say sh MAKEDEV bpf3 it makes bpf0, bpf1, and bpf2 as well? It does this for tunX but not bpfX, for some reason.. why the inconsistency? Thanks, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810291922.LAA27011>