Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:01:16 GMT
From:      James Raynard <jraynard@dial.pipex.com>
To:        julian@ref.tfs.com
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Flaws in system() implementation?
Message-ID:  <199604270001.AAA01849@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <199604251802.LAA25761@ref.tfs.com> (julian@ref.tfs.com)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> > Joerg said that the draft POSIX spec is on the (old) WC Internet Info
> > cdrom.  I haven't got it.
> 
> I have actually only got the x/open XPG4 spec which says that it is POSIX2 
> compliant

Is this readily available anywhere? (I've got the CDROM on order -
lots of other useful stuff like RFCs on there, apparently).

> > It's less ambiguous than julianese :-).  It completely specifies the
> gee thanks :)

Don't worry, I find your posts quite intelligible, which is more than
you can say for most standards 8-)

Cheers
James

-- 
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland
mail:	jraynard@dial.pipex.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604270001.AAA01849>