Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 16:27:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nm Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9809081626360.458-100000@picnic.mat.net> In-Reply-To: <199809081758.KAA01148@usr07.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > As a suggestion, does it seem reasonable to have a wrapper for nm such > > that it read ONLY the -elf or -aout flag, stripped it off, and then > > dispatched either the nm-elf or nm-aout tool? > > That's dumb. Why would it use a flag instead of reading the magic > number off the file? The whole things academic, caused because I did a setenv in one window and a test in another. Dump this thread. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. > > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@glue.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic (FreeBSD-current) (301) 220-2114 | and jaunt (NetBSD). ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9809081626360.458-100000>