Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 22:42:46 +0100 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SSP now default for ports/packages, ssp/new_xorg repository EOL Message-ID: <5456A556.9020400@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <54568DA2.6030309@FreeBSD.org> References: <54568DA2.6030309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-11-02 21:01, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports and Package users, > > Ports now have SSP enabled by default. The package repository will now build SSP by default as well. SSP is "Stack Smashing Protection" and can be read about at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection. > > This only applies to the head (/latest) packages, not the Quarterly branch packages. This applies to the ports checkout that portsnap uses. > > WITHOUT_SSP can be defined in make.conf to not use this feature. > > SSP will be used to build ports (with -fstack-protector) on all amd64 releases and i386 releases which are 10.0 or newer. > > The "ssp" repository and "new_xorg" repositories will no longer be updated after 11/15 as they are no longer needed as both are default for ports now. Please update your repository configurations to now only track the /latest repository. This is the default from /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf. Remove any overrides from /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ for the "ssp" or "new_xorg" repositories. > > Regards, > Bryan Drewery on behalf of portmgr Hi Bryan, thats good notes, but how about users tracking ssp and changing the repo or upgrading to 10.1 if released? I suspect packages will be replaced during 10.1 upgrade with NON_SSP packages since the tree was tagged already yesterday by babt. -- olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5456A556.9020400>