Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:40:41 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 9.0 spontaneously reboots
Message-ID:  <4F5F2429.5060502@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F5F214A.6070509@gmail.com>
References:  <4F5E031D.5060203@gmail.com> <4F5E2ADB.6020104@FreeBSD.org> <4F5F00AA.1060008@gmail.com> <4F5F07A3.2010606@FreeBSD.org> <4F5F0C8A.7090203@gmail.com> <4F5F2068.8050101@FreeBSD.org> <4F5F214A.6070509@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig31502CA6E5312FDCA997BCEC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 13/03/2012 10:28, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 13/03/2012 08:59, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>>> The only other weird thing about this server is:
>>>
>>> dev.cpu.0.temperature: 37,0C
>>> dev.cpu.1.temperature: 37,0C
>>> dev.cpu.2.temperature: 35,0C
>>> dev.cpu.3.temperature: 35,0C
>>> dev.cpu.4.temperature: 43,0C
>>> dev.cpu.5.temperature: 43,0C
>>> dev.cpu.6.temperature: 38,0C
>>> dev.cpu.7.temperature: 38,0C
>>> dev.cpu.8.temperature: 38,0C
>>> dev.cpu.9.temperature: 38,0C
>>> dev.cpu.10.temperature: 37,0C
>>> dev.cpu.11.temperature: 37,0C
>>> dev.cpu.12.temperature: 33,0C
>>> dev.cpu.13.temperature: 33,0C
>>> dev.cpu.14.temperature: 34,0C
>>> dev.cpu.15.temperature: 34,0C
>>>
>>> And it's consistent - cores 4 and 5 always are hotter then any other.=

>>> This can be something with scheduler, however this started before any=

>>> actual load. Though numbers are normal I had never seen something
>>> alike...
>>
>> Two cores per socket, and 8 sockets on the board?  If so, that looks
>> absolutely fine to me.  The average temperature is 36.8C but 43.0C is
>> still well within spec.  That difference of just over 6 degrees is not=

>> really significant and probably entirely due to different airflow
>> patterns over the different CPU sockets.  If you swap the CPU package =
in
>> that socket with one of the other ones, you'll find the hot spot stays=

>> put.  You might be able to even things out by rerouteing cables, but
>> really it's not worth the hassle and won't make any perceptible
>> difference to performance.
>=20
> Nope:
>=20
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5620  @ 2.40GHz (2394.05-MHz
> K8-class CPU)
> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 16 CPUs
> FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 SMT threads
>=20
> So the difference is about one physical core with two SMT threads.
>=20

Which explains why the numbers go in pairs -- there's only 8 physical cor=
es.

Even so, I don't think there's any great problem there.  Different cores
in the same package can have different temperatures -- that's perfectly
normal, and due to the physical properties of the CPU package and the
local environment rather than any difference in processing load between
cores.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey



--------------enig31502CA6E5312FDCA997BCEC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9fJCkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxATQCeOoeUvTKoiUOwbtO57CHbkCSN
cuEAnivdZ7iPwhEs8+WGh8vfO9UC8w0S
=nw7p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig31502CA6E5312FDCA997BCEC--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5F2429.5060502>