Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:25:21 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: msch@snafu.de Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IRQ-Routing for 5.3-BETA Message-ID: <419054C1.5050608@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200409252126.36670.msch@snafu.de> References: <200409232235.08683.msch@snafu.de> <200409251822.11019.msch@snafu.de> <4155AE43.5010704@root.org> <200409252126.36670.msch@snafu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 19:43, Nate Lawson wrote: > >>Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: >>When the BIOS gives an initial irq, we always try to route to that >>one first since some devices don't work at any other irq. > > > I marked the appropriate IRQ in the BIOS as "ISA/nonPnP", so the marked > IRQ *should* be assigned for the ISA card by the BIOS (but obviously > isn't). > > I hope I could clear the situation a bit. > > I sure can switch to 6-CURRENT or at least try the new acpi_pci_link.c, > but I don't believe that the problem is IRQ 9.... > > Thank you very much for your interest. I fear, these old ISA cards are > no longer of public interest... :-) I MFC'd the change to RELENG_5 as well so if you can test there or on 6-current, you should fine that the card works as before. The change was to allow the SCI (irq 9 on PIC systems) to always be used for devices, even if the ACPI _PRS setting for the device doesn't explicitly allow it. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419054C1.5050608>