Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:14:39 -0600 From: John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add LINUX_OSRELEASE to bsd.linux-rpm.mk Message-ID: <18418.31631.482024.144549@gromit.timing.com> In-Reply-To: <51494351@bs1.sp34.ru> References: <07011489@ipt.ru> <20080321115227.zkcrs6rvc4c8s004@webmail.leidinger.net> <98037310@ipt.ru> <20080322085434.10838040@deskjail> <62336383@ipt.ru> <62213004@bs1.sp34.ru> <18418.26253.180946.712309@gromit.timing.com> <51494351@bs1.sp34.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote at 21:34 +0400 on Apr 1, 2008: > > I've always disliked specifying the package file format in the linux > > .mk file name. > > The thing is that linux-rpm.mk will stay and a new one should be > introduced for other purpose (i.e. to decide when to use different > linux infrastructure ports). Understood. I still don't like the name, but I can live with it ;) I think there's too much stuff in there that has nothing to do with rpm-ness. And there's rpm-ness that is not necessarily specific to linux-ness (although for all practical purpose I doubt there will ever be a significant need to support rpm on a non-linux platform, so that's a minor quibble).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18418.31631.482024.144549>