Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:20:45 -0700 (MST)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject:   Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412270815200.63470@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <549E5ED5.50103@gmx.de>
References:  <201412270230.sBR2UIq3071725@fire.js.berklix.net> <549E5ED5.50103@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, olli hauer wrote:

> On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Hi ports@
>> What URL(s) do I need under
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/
>> to get to the Attic for last copy of eg ports/mail/demime ?
>>
>> How is one supposed to find URLs /svn rev nos ?
>> (I have a local svn if it helps, but was looking on web)
>>
>> demime was removed after release date 2012-01 of 9.0.0
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/tags/RELEASE_9_0_0/mail/demime/
>>
>> I want to know not just URL but also How to find last URL/ svn
>> revision numbers, as I'm trying to rescue & upgrade a few ports from oblivion.
>>
>> I presume there's some better way to search than binary search
>> (repeated splitting & re-search in the middle between narowing dates) ?
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> with viewvc only it is not that easy, but with (svn) command line.
>
> $ grep demime /usr/ports/MOVED
> mail/demime||2011-12-28|Has expired: No upstream development since 2007
>
> $ svn log -qv -r '{2011-12-28}':'{2011-12-29}'
> r288196 | rene | 2011-12-28 18:49:04 +0100 (Wed, 28 Dec 2011)
> Changed paths:
> ...
>   M /head/mail/Makefile
>   D /head/mail/demime
> ...
>
> Setting 288195 as sticky revision in viewvc we get this URL
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/mail/demime/?pathrev=288195

There is also an entry in the ports FAQ in the Committer's Guide:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#ports-qa-re-adding

I think I could make a good case for moving that ports FAQ into the 
Porter's Handbook, even if it is for committers.  Certainly bringing 
back old ports is not uncommon for porters or committers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1412270815200.63470>