Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:28:49 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" <floris@vangog.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box Message-ID: <20020108152849.A24367@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0@pc48> References: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de> <20020105190829.A65181@freebie.xs4all.nl> <044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0@pc48>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > Hoi, > > Well I guess it's just a slow box then. Still doesnt feel right that it > can not route 7kb/sec (+- 200 udp packets) speedy enough not to notice Well routing packets/sec != ping != delay. > there is a gateway in between. It's not a strange thing that it is not > acting as my gateway at this point. You wrote that you are using nat. It's no problem for me to saturate a 10Mbit LAN with a NoName, but without nat and without routing with the box. But you seem to have cache RAM installed, which I don't. I never got mine stable with cache installed :( Yes it's a slow box - even with Cache. It's a low cost board build in 1994. > Oh well I'll just try to get this linux emulation working and see if > that Compaq compiler will do any good on it.. If not then I have a good > box to test both running-speed and portability of my applications on :-) ccc bring you good speed improvements - especialy on non-BWX machines. It would be good to see our port supporting the C++ capable versions, but I don't had the time and experience to update the port myself. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020108152849.A24367>