Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:40:25 +0600 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Tom Servo <tomservo@myrealbox.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: buildkernel with gcc-3.0.1 Message-ID: <20011122234025.A3216@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <3BFD2C26.9080300@myrealbox.com>; from tomservo@myrealbox.com on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:47:34PM %2B0100 References: <3BFD2C26.9080300@myrealbox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Tom Servo wrote: > I installed gcc-3.0.1 this afternoon and recompiled the kernel with it > instead of gcc-2.95.3 which will be installed with FreeBSD 4.4. Does it > bring any improvement? Or does it have disadvantages (since gcc-3.0.1 > was tagged "in progress" or so)? As I noticed the kernel grew slightly, > but atm it looks stable to me (2 hrs right now :) > > Anyone who would not recommend using gcc-3.0.1? I think that there is no advanatges in compiling kernel with gcc 3.0.1. The disadvatage is that 3.0.1 is not in base system yet so compiling kernel with it is not supported. It may or may not work for you properly but if it will not nobody will be able to help you. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011122234025.A3216>