Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:31:40 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, bf1783@googlemail.com Subject: Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements Message-ID: <20101214093140.00007aad@unknown> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin%2Bqr7Y-vMTbKg9ZKE6_zE%2BNVYFEMX%2BPwy4vbym@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTin%2Bqr7Y-vMTbKg9ZKE6_zE%2BNVYFEMX%2BPwy4vbym@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 +0000 "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote: > The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in > r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this > change may have been an unintended, but it followed a discussion in > which Warner rejected a related patch proposed by Garrett Cooper, > partly because sysinstall is included in build-tools in Makefile.inc1, > even though some thought that it should not be. In any event, you > should probably look into that before committing the last part of your > patch. I'm wondering if people might be surprised to find sade gone if they set WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL - one's an installer, the other a partitioning program. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101214093140.00007aad>