Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:10:01 GMT From: Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations are slower Message-ID: <201309012010.r81KA1dQ016313@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/181632; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations are slower Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:06:40 -0700 --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was in this commit: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=122766 The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() and acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of the code, added with the same commit. If the distinctions are not necessary, I don't know why the author would make them. --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was= in this commit:<br><div><br><a href=3D"http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head= /sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=3D122766">http://svnweb.freebsd.org/bas= e/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=3D122766</a><br> <br></div><div>The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS= () and <br>acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of = the code, added with<br>the same commit.=A0 If the distinctions are not nec= essary, I don't know why the author<br> </div><div>would make them.<br></div></div> --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201309012010.r81KA1dQ016313>