Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 14:06:31 +0000 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r353900 - head/math/sage Message-ID: <537226E5.3050106@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <537224CE.9090102@missouri.edu> References: <201405122148.s4CLmHuC073536@svn.freebsd.org> <53717BE3.5020100@missouri.edu> <D26D0EF5-6A6F-4802-B1A0-8906691C4A8D@adamw.org> <537224CE.9090102@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/13/2014 08:57 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 05/13/2014 08:54 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 12 May 2014, at 21:56, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: >> >>> On 05/12/2014 04:48 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>> Author: adamw >>>> Date: Mon May 12 21:48:17 2014 >>>> New Revision: 353900 >>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/353900 >>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r353900/ >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Add some more helpful time-saving tips. >>> >>> This is a rather obnoxious way to do business. Please revert this >>> change, or I will complain on the developers mailing list very loudly. >>> >>> Please note it is not your opinion that I am complaining about. We can >>> all disagree, and even get very vocal about it. It is the way you >>> expressed your opinion that I find extremely upsetting. >> >> Do some yoga breathing, look around, and see if you can locate your >> sense of humour. I just checked and no babies died. >=20 > If you fix it, I will treat it as a joke, and we can move on. >=20 Thanks for fixing it. Look, you do make some good points. I'll really try to think of better ways to achieve the same thing. I already came to the conclusion that the 60 second wait is too long. But it is also a port that is somewhat non-functional. It doesn't build with FreeBSD-10. And recently I tried updating it to version 6.2, and this looks like it is also going to be problematical. There are many issues with it. That's why I am not in a big hurry to get things fixed. But I do get your points, and I am listening. Also, you could have done a spoof post of the same nature. And then I would have got the joke, and not become furious. Stepping on someone else's port is not a good joke to make.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537226E5.3050106>