Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 14:20:03 +0200 From: Arve Ronning <arve.ronning@alcatel.no> To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: I4B: IPCP address negotiation Message-ID: <3528C873.88DEB913@alcatel.no>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following is a slightly edited log from a _successful_ call to my ISP Apr 5 12:27:03 Gate /kernel: isppp0: ipcp input(req-sent): <conf-nak id=0x5 len=10 3-6-c0-c1-c2-b3> ipcp nak opts: address [wantaddr 192.193.194.179] [agree] ipcp output <conf-req id=0x7 len=10 3-6-c0-c1-c2-b3> ipcp input(req-sent): <conf-req id=0x2 len=10 3-6-c0-c1-c2-f4> ipcp parse opts: address ipcp parse opt values: address 0.0.0.1 [ack] send conf-ack ipcp output <conf-ack id=0x2 len=10 3-6-c0-c1-c2-f4> ipcp input(ack-sent): <conf-ack id=0x7 len=10 3-6-c0-c1-c2-b3> ipcp tlu If I understand this correctly, my end accepts his proposal to use hisaddr = 192.193.194.244. However, netstat shows that my end continues to use hisaddr = 0.0.0.1. I'm worried about sending an illegal IP address onto the Internet. Is this behaviour on i4b's part correct ? If yes, what makes 0.0.0.1 special ? (reserved use in PPP ?) Thanx for your time, And : thanx to all involved for the excellent i4b work. -Arve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3528C873.88DEB913>