Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 02:28:11 -0800 (PST) From: dima@freebsd.org (Dima Ruban) To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Cc: jkh%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com, hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: kgdb.. Message-ID: <199601171028.CAA02209@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <9601161808.AA23417@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> from "garyj@frt.dec.com" at Jan 16, 96 07:08:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
garyj@frt.dec.com writes: > > > jkh@time.cdrom.com writes: > > What's the deal with kgdb, isn't it supposed to die in favor of `gdb -k' > > RSN? > > > > Jordan > > I've wondered myself why it's still in the tree. Seems to me that > `gdb -k' works pretty well. Or does someone know of a reason NOT > to eliminate kgdb ? kgdb has pretty good command language, and gdb doesn't ... > > --- > Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com > (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de > (play) gj@freebsd.org > > > -- dima
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601171028.CAA02209>