Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:46:13 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: libkern version of inet_ntoa_r Message-ID: <CACqU3MWjco2o6ZMD1syujHtBGegYZ84Prw9w0UFG9p68B2Drmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207282238420.4474@ai.fobar.qr> References: <20120725155211.GA33971@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207282213171.4474@ai.fobar.qr> <CACqU3MVjcHBkc_PYViTX51rJX7m_eq7Bf7uNH0QFqQVnkyddYA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207282238420.4474@ai.fobar.qr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > Which again leaves me with the question - why does libc have it? > as for the semantic, theoretical, "why", I would refer you to the POSIX's comity, as inet_ntop() is part of it. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MWjco2o6ZMD1syujHtBGegYZ84Prw9w0UFG9p68B2Drmg>